Jessica’s adherence to virtue ethics influences her recommendation for action by prioritizing the sanctity of life and the virtues of compassion and responsibility. Her decision may lean towards continuing the pregnancy, driven by her commitment to virtuous principles. Subsequently, Marco’s consequentialist thinking shapes his recommendation by focusing on the potential outcomes and consequences of having a child with a disability. His concern for the economic burden may lead him to consider options such as abortion, viewing it as a means to improve their overall well-being and prospects (Stahl & Kilner, 2017).
Aunt Maria’s deontological perspective guides her recommendation by emphasizing moral duties and divine intention. Her plea for Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy aligns with a sense of obligation and adherence to moral rules, influenced by her belief in God’s plan, while Dr. Wilson’s utilitarian approach influences his recommendation by prioritizing the overall well-being and quality of life for Jessica, Marco, and the potential child. His suggestion of abortion as a responsible medical alternative is driven by a desire to minimize potential suffering and maximize overall happiness for the individuals involved (Stahl & Kilner, 2017). In summary, each character’s ethical theory shapes their recommendations for action. Jessica’s virtue ethics prioritizes the sanctity of life, Marco’s consequentialist perspective focuses on outcomes, Aunt Maria’s deontological stance emphasizes moral duties, and Dr. Wilson’s utilitarian approach seeks to maximize overall well-being. |